Both workflows restated the build in YAML: gofmt, go vet and go test inline
in two places, buildx inline in a third, and the chart's version sed'd into
Chart.yaml before packaging. The Makefile added in 1081260 then described
the same checks a second time for local use, which made "green locally means
green in CI" a promise about keeping two files in step rather than a
property of the setup.
riksdata and rd-web never had that problem — their workflows call make and
have done all along. This repo was the odd one out, and only because it had
no Makefile until today. Now ci.yaml runs `make fmt lint test`, release.yaml
runs the same plus `make binaries`, `make push`, `make helm-package` and
`make helm-push`, and the reasoning behind each check lives on the target
rather than in whichever YAML file was edited last.
Three things change rather than just move:
The chart is linted before it is published. release.yaml packaged and pushed
without ever rendering the templates, so a chart that did not compile would
have reached the registry and been found by Flux. ci.yaml gained a chart job
for the same reason.
helm package --version --app-version replaces the sed. The published
metadata is identical, but the tree is no longer mutated mid-build, and it
is what the rest of the release process already assumed happened.
`make push` refuses VERSION=dev. Publishing is one command now, so it is
also one command to run by accident; dev is not a version anyone releases.
Deliberately not moved: uploading the release assets. Compiling them is
`make binaries` and runs anywhere, but the upload needs a token and the
Gitea release API, which is the workflow's business and not something worth
a target.
`push` builds and pushes in one step, unlike riksdata's separate build and
push, because buildx cannot load a multi-platform image into the local store
— it can only push it. `build` stays single-platform and local-only.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S7R4gWTz5wh5xCY4nCSJjN
go vet says nothing about import order, so when the move to git.ryuvia.com
rewrote every import path without re-sorting them -- the new path sorts before
github.com/..., where the old one sorted after -- both repos went through a
green CI run and a release unformatted.
Added to the release workflow as well as CI, so the two keep running the same
checks; ci.yaml's header claims exactly that, and a check in one but not the
other would quietly make it false.
The step handles gofmt's two failure modes separately because they do not look
alike: a misformatted file is listed on stdout with exit 0, so the failure has
to be raised by hand, while a file that does not parse prints nothing to stdout
and exits 2 -- which a plain emptiness test reads as success. Verified against
all three cases (clean, misformatted, unparseable) before committing.
Helm writes a refreshed repository index to the default cache directory and
then looks for it in the overridden one, so setting both is how the chart
tooling breaks on this machine already.
The module path, the container image, the Helm chart and the CI pipeline all
named GitHub. They now name the Gitea instance everything else already runs on.
The workflows are rewritten rather than translated. Gitea's runner image is
ubuntu:22.04, whose nodejs is Node 12, so no JS action runs there at all --
actions/checkout@v4 dies with a SyntaxError before it does anything. Every step
is shell, checkout is a plain clone (this repo is public, so it needs no
credential), and the jobs that need docker or helm run in host mode because the
dind bridge a `container:` job gets cannot reach github.com or get.helm.sh.
Two consequences worth naming:
- upload-artifact/download-artifact are also JS actions, and there is no
artifact store here, so the job that builds the binaries is the job that
publishes them. Nothing is passed between jobs.
- setup-qemu-action is gone with the rest, and the runner has no binfmt
registration. The Dockerfile's builder stage now runs on $BUILDPLATFORM and
cross-compiles from TARGETARCH instead, which is what keeps the arm64 image
buildable -- and makes it native rather than emulated.
The chart moves from a GitHub Pages index to an OCI artifact in Gitea's
registry. Publishing stays tag-only for the reason recorded in release.yaml: a
workflow triggered by the branch push cannot know the version it is about to be
tagged with.
The GitHub repository is left in place and untouched. Nothing pushes to it any
more, but its existing release downloads and chart index keep resolving.
Niklas Ye