155f27ca62734a975f4420c9c53bed001c0d7de2
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
a27ff49171 |
Sign in through an OpenID Connect provider, and from a terminal
terdut can now sign people in through any OIDC provider (written against Authentik), and let groups at the provider decide who may sign in, which teams they belong to and whether they administer the install. Password login keeps working alongside it; TERDUT_PASSWORD_LOGIN=false turns it off, and is refused at startup unless SSO is configured. With no TERDUT_OIDC_* setting nothing changes, so every existing install behaves as before. Identity is (issuer, subject), never email or username: those are mutable at the provider and a recycled address must not inherit an account. An existing user is linked by email only when the provider marks it verified, or TERDUT_OIDC_TRUST_EMAIL is set, which Authentik needs. Group grants are marked source='oidc' on team_members and users, and the sync changes only those rows. Hand-made memberships and administrators are left alone, and the sync bypasses the last-owner and last-admin guards because the provider is the source of truth for what it grants. Editing managed access by hand is refused with 409, since the next sign-in would undo it. The web UI badges it as SSO and disables the controls. Groups are read only at sign-in, so an SSO session carries a hard ceiling (sessions.max_expires_at, 12h by default) that sliding never extends. There is no refresh token, which means API keys of somebody removed at the provider stay valid until an administrator disables the user. That is accepted and documented, not fixed. A client with no browser, the TUI over SSH, signs in with a device code run by terdut itself (POST /api/oidc/device and /device/token), so the terminal never talks to the provider and ends up with the ordinary terdut_session cookie. Only a browser session can approve a code; an API key cannot. /device?code= sends a signed-out visitor through sign-in and back, which is what oidc_logins.next is for. oauth2 is pinned to v0.36.0: v0.37 needs Go 1.26 and the Dockerfile builds on 1.25. Migrations 011 and 012 add tables and defaulted columns only. |
||
|
|
07914d5cdb |
Give the Admin tab sub-sections of its own
Administration was one scrolling page with three cards on it: the teams, the people, and the settings. There was no way to link somebody to the settings, no way back to the top of the user list but scrolling, and the poll loop refetched all three endpoints every tick however little of the page you were looking at. Each is now a route -- /admin/teams, /admin/users, /admin/settings -- reached from a strip across the top, with /admin an overview that says how many of each there are. The three cards themselves are untouched; they are simply rendered one at a time, so a tab fetches only what it shows. The Users page is the exception and fetches the teams too, since its invite form has to offer a team to invite somebody into. The strip is ordinary links rather than chips. Chips filter what a page already shows, here and in the queue, and these four go somewhere: the browser's Back walks them, a reload lands where you were, and the click is intercepted by the same handler every other link in the app uses. The current one is marked with aria-current="page", the convention the tab bar has used since it existed, so the state lives on the attribute and not in a class. admin.js owns the table of the four routes, because it also builds the strip that links to them; app.js parses against that table rather than keeping a second list to drift from it. Adding a fifth sub-section is one line. The bottom tab bar still has six items. |
||
|
|
ac9af8e4f5 |
Manage a person's account and teams from one page
The Admin tab could make somebody an administrator and disable them, and
nothing else. Setting a first password, deleting an account and seeing
which teams a person is in all meant curl, and the last one meant opening
each team in turn — the Team tab answers "who is in this team", which is
the wrong way round when the question is about a person.
A name in the user list now opens /admin/users/{id}: their email and when
they joined, where their notifications go, the administrator and disabled
flags, the teams they are in with their role in each, a password field
for a first or forgotten one, and deletion. A section of its own rather
than an expanding row, because memberships and the account actions
together are more than a table row can hold and still be read on a phone.
Adding somebody mints an invite link into a chosen team rather than
creating a bare account. POST /api/users makes a user with no password
and no team, who can sign in nowhere and would see nothing if they did;
the invite machinery from #7 already solves both, and the password is
chosen by the person it belongs to instead of passing through an
administrator.
One new endpoint, GET /api/users/{id}/teams, self or admin. /api/teams is
always about the caller and cannot be asked about anybody else. It 404s
for a user who does not exist, so the page can tell "in no teams" from
"no such person" — an empty list is a real answer and needed to stay one.
No authorisation changed, and the interesting part is why it did not.
requireTeamOwner has accepted the administrator flag since
|